Authentic Leadership vs. Manipulative Leadership
The Rise and Fall Of Innovative Giants
Welcome to my 28th blog post! Click here to read more from previous posts.
“Listening was the most important thing I accomplished each day because it would build the foundation of leadership for years to come.”
These words by Satya Nadella, the CEO of Microsoft, reflect a leadership approach focused on empathy, understanding, and connection with others.
In the other side, we have the quote from Jeffrey Skilling - Former CEO of Enron, who claimed, “We're the good guys, we're on the side of angels.”
These two quotes represent a striking difference in tone and values between authentic leadership and manipulative leadership.
In the world of business, leaders play a critical role in shaping the success or downfall of their organizations. Microsoft's transformation from a complacent company with a cutthroat culture to an innovation and growth-driven company stands as a result to the impact of authentic leadership. On the other hand, Enron, once named as one of the most innovative companies, met its demise in one of the biggest fraud scandals in history, largely due to manipulative leadership practices.
It brings me to a question: How can we distinguish an authentic leader from a manipulative leader? By exploring the contrasting leadership styles of Microsoft and Enron, we can uncover the answer. Understanding the characteristics that define these leadership styles is key to recognizing their impact and making informed judgments.
Authentic Leadership
Authentic leaders are genuine, transparent, and guided by a strong sense of integrity. They prioritize the well-being of their employees and strive to build trust, open communication, and culture of respecting others. Key traits include:
Transparency & Integriy: Authentic leaders believe in open sharing of information and motives, creating an atmosphere of trust and openness. They are not afraid to show vulnerability or admit their mistakes in front of their employees. By embracing transparency, they build integrity, which in turn fosters trust - an essential foundation for a company's success.
Empathy and Perspective-Taking: They demonstrate understanding, compassion, and actively listen to their employees' concerns and needs. They provide emotional support for employee by creating a safe and collaborative environment where eveyone can openly share their opinions without the fear of judgement. They actively seek to understand the perspectives of others and avoid bias, ensuring that decisions are made with empathy and inclusivity.
Consistency: Integrity is a core value for authentic leaders, and they demonstrate it by aligning their words with their actions. Consistency in their behavior and decision-making processes allows them to maintain their integrity, which in turn helps them establish credibility among employees, business partners, and shareholders. Their consistent approach builds trust and fosters a sense of stability within the organization.
Self-awareness: Authentic leaders possess deep self-awareness, understanding their own values, strengths, and weaknesses. They ensure that their actions and decisions align with their core values and principles. By staying true to themselves, they avoid the need for manipulative tactics to achieve their goals. This self-awareness enables them to lead with authenticity and integrity.
“I buy more books than I can finish. I sign up for more online courses than I can complete. I fundamentally believe that if you are not learning new things, you stop doing great and useful things. So family, curiosity and hunger for knowledge all define me.” - Satya Nadella
That’s what Satya Nadella described himself in his first email to Microsoft’s employees as the CEO. Satya Nadella introduced himself in a humble manner. Instead of highlighting his impressive accomplishments or extraordinary capabilities, he chose to emphasize three fundamental aspects that define him authentically: family, curiosity, and a relentless desire for learning. In this simple yet powerful introduction, Nadella sets the tone for his leadership style - one that is grounded in authenticity, humility, and an unwavering dedication to personal growth.
It's important to note the culture at Microsoft prior to Nadella's tenure, described as cutthroat and hierarchical, where individual brilliance and aggressive internal competition were emphasized. However, Nadella brought a different perspective to the table.
Firstly, he emphasized empathy is the core of innovation. It’s not just a soft skill to effectively manage people, but also has a tight relation to business. When leaders and employees know how to empathize with each other, they will know how to empathize with their customers. In the technology industry, where solving unmet needs is paramount, adopting a customer-centric approach becomes essential.
Secondly, he emphasized the importance of constructive communication by asking the company’s top executives to read Marshall Rosenberg’s Nonviolent Communication as one of his first acts after becoming CEO in February 2014. Effective and respectful communication serves as the foundation for building collaboration within teams, and listening became a daily priority for Nadella.
Thirdly, Nadella initiated a significant cultural transformation, shifting the company's mindset from being "know-it-alls" to "learn-it-alls." Influenced by Stanford professor Carol Dweck's book "Mindset", this transformation impacted various aspects of the organization, including business strategies, behaviors, and mindset. Rather than anchoring on the past success of Windows, Nadella focused on the industry shift towards mobile and cloud computing, driving Microsoft's competitive edge in the market.
Under Nadella's leadership, Microsoft underwent a holistic transformation, moving away from a solely number-driven evaluation system. The emphasis shifted towards collaboration, continuous learning, feedback, and personal development. This cultural change encouraged employees to take risks, learn from failures, and innovate while fostering a culture of trust and respect.
When the culture, behaviors, and mindset are positively transformed, business performance follows suit. Microsoft's market valuation has grown from being a three-hundred-billion-dollar company to a trillion-dollar company. This remarkable growth is a demonstration to the power of authentic leadership and the positive impact it can have on an organization.
Manipulative Leadership
Manipulative leaders employ tactics aimed at exerting control, following their personal agendas, or gaining power. They exploit others' vulnerabilities, engage in deception, and prioritize their self-interest over the well-being of employees. Key traits include:
Deception: Manipulative leaders may provide false information, create fictional narratives, or present a distorted version of truth to shape perceptions and control outcomes. By manipulating the information others receive, they can influence decision-making and gain their own advantages.
Emotional manipulation: They exploit emotions, such as fear, guilt, or flattery, to influence and control others. In one hand, they may use threats, intimidation, or create a sense of impending consequences to manipulate behaviors of employees. In the other hand, they may shower some employees with compliments, recognition, or rewards to create a sense of loyalty and dependency from employees.
Power play: Manipulative leaders often seek to consolidate power and suppress dissent. By exploiting hierarchical structures, they may discourage open dialogue, create an environment of fear or intimidation, or marginalize those who challenge their authority. By silencing dissent, they maintain control over the narrative and limit alternative perspectives that could threaten their power.
Lack of transparency: They withhold information or engage in misdirection to maintain control and limit others' awareness. They may avoid transparency in their decision-making processes, leaving others in the dark about the reasoning behind certain actions.
The rise and fall of Enron serves as a prime example of manipulative leadership in action. Established in 1985, Enron quickly rose to become one of the largest and most renowned energy companies in the United States. Enron was even named by Fortune as “America’s Most Innovative Company” for six successive years (1996-2001). Its peak market valuation used to reach $70 billion, and its stock was traded at $90 per share in August 2000. However, just in more than one year, its stock price quickly went to nearly zero and Enron filed bankruptcy in December 2001 in the most unusual and dramatic way in the corporate history.
The downfall of Enron can be attributed to the unethical practices of its leadership team, with Jeffrey Skilling, the former CEO, and Andrew Fastow, the former CFO, playing central roles in the scandal. They proposed and implemented the use of off-balance-sheet partnerships and special purpose entities (SPE) to manipulate financial statements and deceive investors. While these financial tools themselves are not inherently illegal, Enron abused them to hide debts, inflate earnings, and create a false perception of the company's financial health.
Unlike other energy companies that utilized commodity derivatives primarily for hedging purposes, Enron extensively engaged in these financial instruments for profit-making. The leaders' extreme greed and focus on financial gains became the driving force behind Enron's demise. The company's culture became tainted by a toxic combination of greed and the pursuit of personal financial benefits, leading to its downfall.
During Skilling's tenure, he implemented the "rank and yank" system to evaluate employees' performance. This system ruthlessly pushed the bottom 20% of underperformers out of the company, fostering fierce competition and creating an environment of total distrust among employees. This cutthroat approach stifled collaboration and hindered the development of a healthy work environment.
Furthermore, Enron's leaders resorted to coercion and intimidation tactics to silence and manipulate employees who voiced concerns about the company's unethical practices. Skilling's leadership fostered a culture of fear, where questioning or challenging the company's actions was actively discouraged.
The lack of ethics and integrity within Enron ultimately led to its rapid and dramatic downfall. When the dot-com bubble burst, Enron's losses could no longer be concealed, resulting in the company's demise. Skilling's actions not only resulted in one of the largest corporate scandals in history but also had far-reaching consequences, impacting employees, investors, and the broader business landscape. The scandal even took down Arthur Andersen, Enron's auditor and one of the world's top five accounting firms at the time, which had been in business for nearly a century.
In conclusion, the stories of Microsoft and Enron highlight the critical role of values in shaping the success or downfall of a company. The values demonstrated through the words and actions of leaders and employees are key determinants of organizational outcomes. It takes courage to live, work, and lead according to true values. By promoting authentic leadership and guarding against manipulation, companies can create a positive and empowering work environment for all.
That’s all for today. Till next week!
Cheers,
Do Thi Dieu Thuong